Ambac & MBIA Off Credit Watch

By: Dr. Jay H. Abrams
Chief Municipal Credit Analyst

View Related Articles

  • View All News & Insights




    • Looking for Specific Bonds?

    Do you have specific criteria for bonds you're looking for? Let us know and we'll e-mail you bonds that fit your needs. There is no charge for this service.

    Yes, please send me customized offerings.
    Yes, please send me bond strategies and commentaries.

    Maturity Range -
    (example: 10yrs-30yrs)
    E-mail
    Name
    Phone

    Ambac & MBIA Off Credit Watch

    In a sign that the worst news may be behind the bond insurance industry, Standard & Poor’s has affirmed the ratings of both Ambac and MBIA and removed them from CreditWatch.  They were, however, assigned ‘Negative’ outlooks.

    A strong capital position and ample claims paying ability were indicated as the main reasons for the rating affirmations.  The ratings of both insurance giants had been lowered from ‘AAA’ on June 5, 2008 due to their exposures to domestic non-prime mortgages and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs).

    Success to date in remediating outstanding mortgage related exposure was sufficient for CreditWatch removal. 

    CreditWatch is used by S&P to signal a short-term specific event or change to a credit’s profile that could initiate a rating change.  At the time of their downgrades, it was not clear to S&P whether Ambac and MBIA would have further erosion of their capital and increased exposure to the mortgage crisis.  Since then, both insurers have taken steps to limit future mortgage losses and have added additional capital.

    The ‘Negative’ Outlooks assigned to both are less worrisome.  Outlooks have up to a three-year time horizon and indicate trends or business prospects that may cause a rating change, but are not necessarily indicative of one. 

    In the case of both insurers, attempts to resurrect their financial guaranty business are underway through recapitalization of existing dormant business units, which would allow them to write new municipal bond insurance policies. 

    S&P, in its announcement, lauded those plans, but assigned the ‘Negative’ Outlooks to reflect the lack of present new business, and the preliminary nature of both insurers’ prospects.

    S&P’s rating actions were a vote of confidence in the ability of both companies to meet outstanding insurance commitments.  The only question, in the rating agency’s mind, was how they may fare writing new insurance in the future.  For S&P, that still remains up in the air.

    8/18/2008

    *_ANALYST CERTIFICATION
    SEC Regulation AC_*
    I, Jay H. Abrams, hereby certify that the views expressed in these research reports accurately reflect my personal views about the subject securities and issuers. I also certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or view expressed in these reports.*__*

    *_IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE _*
    These reports have been prepared and issued by FMSbonds, Inc. and approved for publication. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

    These research reports are prepared for general information and are circulated for general information only. They do not take into consideration the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive these reports.

    Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or any options, futures, or other derivatives related to such securities ("related investments"). Officers of FMSbonds, Inc. or one of its affiliates may have a financial interest in securities of the issuer(s) or in related investments.



    Back t o Top