Bond Insurer Woes Continue

By: James A. Klotz
President

View Related Articles

  • View All News & Insights




    • Looking for Specific Bonds?

    Do you have specific criteria for bonds you're looking for? Let us know and we'll e-mail you bonds that fit your needs. There is no charge for this service.

    Yes, please send me customized offerings.
    Yes, please send me bond strategies and commentaries.

    Maturity Range -
    (example: 10yrs-30yrs)
    E-mail
    Name
    Phone

    Bond Insurer Woes Continue

    Bond insurers MBIA and Ambac are the latest "AAA" guarantors to lose their gilt-edged ratings.

    Moody's reduced MBIA's rating to "A2," while at the same time cutting Ambac Assurance Corporation to "Aa3." Moody's also said that the outlook on both companies is negative.

    The bond insurance crisis has resulted in numerous rating downgrades for the top bond insurers. Five of seven insurers have lost their "AAA" rating.

    These downgrades are a direct result of the insurers straying from their traditional business of insuring municipal bonds, which hardly ever default, to guaranteeing complex derivative securities tied to subprime mortgages.

    Fortunately for bond investors, the underlying quality of municipal bonds remains strong, despite the continuing downward rating spiral of the major bond insurers. For the most part, these former top-rated companies only insured bonds of investment-grade quality, which can be expected to meet debt service commitments on their own. Ironically, the insurance companies' woes are not related to the quality of their municipal portfolios, which continue to perform admirably.

    In the end, the combination of subprime exposure and the prospects of reduced new business from municipalities who are spurning bond insurance, was sufficient to bring down the top ratings that firms like MBIA, Ambac, and FGIC had enjoyed for decades.

    Bondholders' Outlook

    For holders of insured bonds, the impact of continuing insurer downgrades will have a negligible effect on receipt of principal and interest for two major reasons.

    First, bond insurance has typically been purchased by high-quality issuers as a means of lowering interest costs.

    Second, although the bond insurers have seen substantial downgrades, their ratings remain, for the most part, investment-grade, indicating that their claims-paying ability remains intact.

    At FMSbonds, we have always emphasized the fact that we own the bonds we sell. Because of this, our research department, under the auspices of Jay H. Abrams, Ph.D., our chief municipal credit analyst, reviews the underlying credit quality of all bond issues we recommend, whether insured or not. If a material change in a bond's credit quality occurs, it is our responsibility to offer a course of action to our clients.

    We have found in times of uncertainty, independent research capability can provide a strong safeguard of bondholders' interests.

    We are pleased to offer our assistance to any municipal bondholders who would like to know more about the underlying credit quality of their bonds.

    6/20/2008

    This report is produced solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. This report is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but no independent verification has been made, nor is its accuracy or completeness guaranteed.



    Back t o Top