House Votes To Treat Munis As ‘High Quality’ In Bank Rule

Klotz on Bonds

Home > News and Perspectives > House Votes To Treat Munis As ‘High Quality’ In Bank Rule

<h3>James A. Klotz</h3>

James A. Klotz

The House passed a bill that would treat municipal bonds as “high-quality liquid assets” under new banking rules.

A companion bill is expected to be introduced soon in the Senate.

Rules initially excluded munis

The bill was designed to change a rule enacted in 2014 covering large banks.

Proposed in response to the fiscal emergency of 2008, when financial markets froze due to a lack of liquidity, the rule requires these banks to hold enough liquid assets to fund their operations for 30 days if other sources of funding aren’t available.

While foreign sovereign debt securities were considered “high-quality liquid assets” (HQLA) under the rule, investment-grade municipal bonds were not and therefore couldn’t count toward satisfying the requirement.

The exclusion of munis sparked a widespread, bipartisan effort to change the rule.

The House bill was passed by a voice vote last week after it was overwhelmingly approved by the Financial Services Committee.

“If our local leaders decide it’s important to build a new school, hospital, bridge or road for their residents, a federal regulatory misstep shouldn’t stand in their way,” said Rep. Luke Messer, co-sponsor of the bill.

“This bill helps ensure cash-strapped school districts and municipalities will continue to have access to bonds to finance projects they think are best for their communities.”

The liquidity rule was approved by the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

Banks have until Jan. 1, 2017, to comply.

Though the Fed proposed amendments last year that would include some munis, the FDIC and OCC, which regulate most large institutions, have not proposed similar changes.

Good for borrowers, investors

As we stated when the liquidity rules were first proposed (Push Is On To Include Munis In New Banking Rule), excluding munis would be detrimental to both issuers and investors.

Traditionally, large banking institutions have had significant municipal bond holdings.

Excluding munis would result in these institutions becoming less active in the market, resulting in reduced competitive pricing for investors, causing the tax-free bond market to become less liquid.

Ultimately, funding public projects would become more expensive and difficult.

We support the House bill and are hopeful a companion bill will be introduced in the Senate and, ultimately, passage of this bill into law.

James A. Klotz is the President of FMSbonds, Inc.
Email the Author

Feb 16, 2016

Please note that all investing entails risk. Fixed income securities are subject to risks that will affect their value prior to maturity. Some of these risks can be related to changes in market conditions, issuer creditworthiness, and interest rates. This commentary is not a recommendation to buy or sell a specific security. All references to tax-free income refer to U.S. federal income tax. Income earned by certain investors may be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), and or taxation by state and local authorities. Please consult with your tax professional prior to investing. For more information on these topics please click on the “Bond Basics” link below or search by keyword at the top of this page.