Municipal Bond Forum
Determining the ‘quality’ of a municipal bond
Q
In your recent article (Muni Investors Succeed by Defying the Odds), you say investors should look for “quality” municipal bonds first, then yield. How should I base my determination of quality? Ratings? If so, which one do you feel has a better pulse on the muni bond market?
A
James A. Klotz responds:
Ratings are a good start, but they should not be the sole criteria for determining the credit quality of a municipal bond.
As bond specialists, we drill down to determine exactly how the bond is secured and how the investor gets his money back. After all, a bond is a loan.
This process involves analyzing the official statement for any obscure but important details, as well as researching previous material disclosures. In some cases there can be political situations that involve lawsuits or potential legal challenges.
Although buying insured bonds allows you to invest with a greater degree of confidence, it is important to also examine the underlying credit as if there were no insurance.
Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s are considered the premier rating agencies for municipals.
Start here.
Do you have specific criteria for bonds you’re looking for? Let us know and we’ll e-mail you bonds that fit your needs. There is no charge for this service.
The responses provided in this forum are meant to address specific questions posed by investors about their municipal bonds and to provide market insight for our general audience. Please note, your investments, objectives, results and experience may differ significantly. Our answers and any potential strategies discussed should not be construed as a solicitation to buy nor sell any security or investment product. All investing entails risk.
