THE MYTH BEHIND LADDERING
Before you decide to invest in municipal bonds, it is important
to determine exactly what you are trying to accomplish.
If your priority is to maintain constant market value in anticipation
of a near-term need for cash, we recommend buying very short-term
bonds or certificates of deposit, insured by the FDIC. If you have
a longer-term horizon and have some degree of risk tolerance, then
invest in high quality, long-term bonds that maximize income and
tax-free cash flow. When it comes to municipal bonds, laddering
sacrifices too much income to be considered much more than a tax-free
savings account.
The Long Term View
Risk is inherent in any investment. When you buy long-term bonds,
we can promise that sometimes these bonds will be worth less than
you paid for them, and sometimes they will be worth more. With a
long-term view, it shouldn't make any difference.
Investors in the higher tax brackets buy municipal bonds because
there is no other investment that can provide comparable returns
with the same degree of safety. By laddering a portfolio, you will
sacrifice the most attractive feature of a municipal bond portfolio:
high tax-free cash flow. Today, long-term, quality tax-free bonds
can be purchased with higher yields than taxable Treasury bonds.
Don't you find it curious that given all the so-called experts
who recommend laddering, not one has produced a model replicating
any period of time in U.S. economic history when this strategy outperformed
simply buying and holding tax-free bonds?
Last week, the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority issued tax-free
bonds. This was a AA-rated issue and had bonds maturing from 2004
to 2032. A laddered portfolio would invest equal sums in 2, 4, 6,
8 and 10-year bonds. These bonds would produce an average return
of 2.77% annually. The long-term bonds were priced to yield 4.79%.
Assuming a total investment of $500,00, the long-term bond produces
income of $23,950 annually, $10,100 more than the laddered portfolio.
(This represents 73% more income.) Since the income earned from
a long-term portfolio will exceed the laddered portfolio by 40-100%,
the laddered portfolio will never catch up.
What About a Rising Rate Environment?
The laddered portfolio, despite popular opinion, never really has
an opportunity to take advantage of dramatically higher rates. Only
20% of the portfolio comes due every two years, and by replacing
them with 10-year bonds (not the highest yielding bonds), it is
difficult to raise the average income of the laddered portfolio.
For example: If, two years after constructing our Triborough Bridge
ladder, long-term interest rates jumped to 10% a 10-year muni would
likely be paying approximately 6%. As the two-year bonds mature,
we will add the new 6% 10-year bond to the ladder. The average annual
income rises only to 3.64%. If, two years later, these higher rates
prevail and the laddered portfolio adds another 6% bond, the annual
income rises to 4.38%. If these rates persisted for another two
years, the laddered portfolio would still be producing less than
5% (4.99) annually.
Meanwhile, over this period, the long-term portfolio has produced
additional income of $20,200 in the first two years, $11,500 during
years three and four, and $4,100 of additional income between year
five and six. The income difference has allowed the long-term investor
to buy $35,000 additional bonds yielding 10% or an additional $3,500
in income.
After year six, the laddered portfolio is producing income of
$24,950 per year, while the long-term portfolio now has 535M in
principal and is producing tax-free income of $27,450.
Get the picture? Obviously, rates are not likely to jump to 10%
in two years, nor stay that high for six years, since 10% long-term
rates would dampen economic activity, setting the stage for lower
rates.
What About Interest Rates
Although we are not in the forecasting business, we believe that
as long as economists and investors are convinced that rates have
nowhere to go but up, we wouldn't be surprised to see them head
even lower.
Inflation, and demand for money, are the main ingredients necessary
for rising rates. In our crystal ball, we don't see a hint of where
either will come from.
If rates don't rise at all or actually decline, obviously the differences
between these two portfolios becomes even more dramatic.
(See " Cost of Waiting" strategies.)
We really can't tell you why many brokers and financial planners
promote the laddering concept. Perhaps they feel it lends an impressive
degree of sophistication to their presentations.
Lately, we have been encouraged by individual investors. Having
witnessed the vaporization of $8 trillion in the equity markets,
they are beginning to rely less on "professional" advice
and more on their own common sense.
|